Little holiday cheer for US science agencies as Congress extends spending freeze

first_imgPatrick McKay/Flickr (CC BY-NC 2.0) Sign up for our daily newsletter Get more great content like this delivered right to you! Country Country * Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia, Plurinational State of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d’Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People’s Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Norway Oman Pakistan Palestine Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Vietnam Virgin Islands, British Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Email At the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) in Bethesda, Maryland, for example, officials will have to wait a little longer for what could be a hefty budget boost. In September, a Senate spending panel approved a $2 billion increase for NIH, nearly doubling a $1.1 billion hike approved earlier by the U.S. House of Representatives. But until Congress passes a final 2018 budget—which NIH officials hope will contain the Senate figure—it will have to maintain 2017 spending levels.The stakes are even higher because of President Donald Trump’s proposal to cut the agency’s 2018 budget by 22%, or $8 billion. Although both Republican and Democratic legislators have vowed to block any reduction in NIH funding (and proposed increases), the president’s desired cut hangs over discussions of a final budget deal.The National Science Foundation (NSF) in Alexandria, Virgina, finds itself in a different, but equally precarious, position. Trump also wants to slash its funding—by $820 million, or 11%—in 2018. And although congressional appropriators don’t favor such steep reductions, the amounts they have proposed for 2018 would still leave NSF between $135 million and $160 million below current levels.At the same time, key lawmakers have said NSF would benefit from a new budget agreement that would significantly raise the current caps on both domestic and military spending. Democrats have long insisted that more spending is needed to address vital national needs. If the Republican majority agrees to such a deal, the result could mean as much as $100 billion more in domestic spending, some of which presumably would go to NSF and other research agencies.The latest CR requires NSF officials to tread cautiously, balancing their hopes for additional funding with watching their dollars, in case their final 2018 budget is lower than current spending levels.The Department of Energy’s Office of Science is in a situation similar to NSF’s—rooting for Congress to adopt preliminary budget numbers that would erase the draconian cuts proposed by Trump. NASA science falls between NIH and NSF on the spending spectrum: Trump has proposed a status quo budget, while the House wants to pump up spending on space science.An extended budget freeze is especially pernicious for the Census Bureau, which is ramping up for the 2020 census. On paper, it should be in an enviable position, as the Trump administration has requested $187 million in supplemental spending for 2018 to help it prepare for the April 2020 count. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross says that new figure corrects low-ball estimates by the previous administration on the cost of the upcoming headcount.However, Congress so far has shown little appetite for the higher number. And census advocates say the agency needs more than double that amount to catch up on chronic underfunding of the decennial exercise. In the meantime, Census officials must make do without an increase as they prepare for a dry run in April 2018.With last night’s passage of the CR, lawmakers bought themselves a few weeks to hammer out compromises. But that may not be enough time to resolve an array of thorny issues, including how to pay for disaster assistance to regions hit by this year’s hurricanes and wildfires and how to stabilize health insurance markets. If they fail, the fallback is another extension of the current freeze—or a government shutdown on the eve of Trump’s first anniversary in office. Little holiday cheer for U.S. science agencies as Congress extends spending freeze By Jeffrey MervisDec. 22, 2017 , 9:15 AM A last-minute decision by Congress to extend a current freeze on federal spending will keep the U.S. government open for another month. Lawmakers yesterday passed a continuing resolution (CR) that orders agencies to continue spending at 2017 levels through 19 January 2018 while Congress tries to settle on final budget numbers for the 2018 fiscal year, which began on 1 October.That’s the big story.But the passage of the CR—which allows legislators to scamper home for the holidays—also means that several research agencies must put on hold their hopes for a happier new year. Click to view the privacy policy. Required fields are indicated by an asterisk (*)last_img read more